Monday, January 08, 2007

The name is Blond...I mean Bond, James Bond.

Its arguably the most hotly contested issue among movie fans across the world. Of course I'm talking about who is the best person to portray James Bond. Now I don't lay claim to having an expert understanding of what makes the ultimate personification of the Ian Flemming creation; however, as is my understanding via television and the related media, it is crucial that the spy is depicted by someone who can convincingly portray the debonair, yet ruthless assasin working for the M16, someone who can effortlessly dispose of villains, looks good in a tux, knows his way around a stick shift Aston, is ready with the quips and of course, knows how to score with the chicks. Awhile back, when it was announced that not only was another bloke was going to take over the Bond mantle from the conventionally suitable Pierce Brosnan, but that he was to be played by the rather blond, nuggety and, dare I say, haggard-faced Daniel Craig, many people (myself included) opined their disapproval. Not someone I instantly would have picked as the sophisticated spy who lives out the dream of young and impressionable males. But...., after seeing the latest incarnation of Bond starring Craig, Casino Royale, can I emphatically say that I am now a believer? Craig is fantastic as Bond and is absolutely convincing as the intense, cold-hearted assassin that quickly disposes of villains either of a humorous caricature-ilk (eye-patch sporting dude, I'm talking to you) or the kind that are prone to a little double-crossing. Most importantly, and dare I say unexpectedly, Craig looks good, full stop. Wardrobe department? personal trainer? whoever? - round of applause for a job well done. Sure there were many moments where it was difficult to stiffle a gaffaw at the antics on display (e.g. crashing through a wall of plaster ala Hulk is one episode that springs to mind) and the plot of which to speak of was somewhat lacking, Another sticking point was the love story plot, where the 007 agent was prepared to sacrifice his commitment to the service for a *gasp!* a woman, which I could not reconcile with the love-em-and-leave-em lothario that he has often been shown as. Nevertheless, with the amount of biffo and brawn on display in this flick, its clear that this Bond was not someone to be triffled with and that he could dispose of someone in the blink of an eye. More so, his bulky physique made Brosnan's previous excursions seem rather wimpish in comparison. The retro intro could have easily veered dangerously into Austin Power's territory but was instead clever and stylish...aaannnnddd the Bond theme song we've all come to know and love was saved for the end! Hooray! From a female perspective, while rather violent, this Bond is certainly a cut above the rest of the imitators of late and though not particularly handsome, Craig effortlessly persuades us that he is the suave and sophisticated secret service agent who can really fill out a three piece suit - you heard right, a three piece!

3 comments:

kaluds said...

this is ace, serenity! i'm not normally a big action movie fan, but from what you've written, i'm tempted to give Casino Royale a go .... any fella who can marry slick, a sharp wit, a three-piece (!) suit AND command the stick shift Aston must have something going for him.

... and considering i've only ever seen daniel craig pouting or frowning, it's kinda nice that he's been getting such favourable reviews. might give him something to smile about ;-)

... and i really like your use of the word "dispose"!

Jonno said...

I've heard some good things about this movie and must admit when I saw the first trailer I was suspicious of the selection of the new Bond. I've avoided the last few but maybe it's now time? A good summation serenity!

M? said...

Oh Serenity... do I detect a crush?

;)